Advocacy for Policy Change

As the name of our organisation shows, our primary focus has always been advocacy and policy influencing. At the same time, we’ve been traditionally also concentrating on building capacity for other NGOs to do the same: API helps civil society organisations and individual citizens to voice their concerns and make the government respect their rights and address their needs. This means empowerment, and we strongly believe that a vibrant and skilled civil society can contribute a lot to the reforms we all expect, both at the local, and at the national level.

img-2

Our Record

API has a long, consistent and mostly successful record of both advocating for policy change and building capacity so that other organisations are able to pursue the same goals. Apart from our efforts towards finally having a law on access to information, which are presented here, we would like to mention the following topics we have been concentrating on over the past more than 15 years:

  • the new Road Traffic Law: For a number of years, API worked closely with road safety networks, where experience and knowledge were exchanged and used as a basis for advocacy campaigns. As a result of our collective efforts, this law was passed by the Parliament back in 2015. After further lobbying work, the Ministry of Information also regulated alcohol advertisements and put up public campaigns against drinking and driving.
  • the Social Accountability Framework: In this area, API has contributed to the improvement of government policies and guidelines, by insisting on the implementation of practices that enhance learning and monitoring, and welcome feedback. We first participated in the implementation of the Social Accountability Framework in the Kampot province, and, now, in a new phase of these projects, we are specifically addressing various issues at the district level and concentrating on the inclusion of disadvantaged groups.
  • the National Budget Laws: By networking with other civil society organisations (CSOs), a constructive dialogue has been created on budget monitoring and transparency, and this has also opened spaces for CSOs to work closely with a number of government ministries, including the Ministry of Information. Also the allocations for education, health, agriculture and social development have been increased.
  • the Anti-Corruption Law: As a member of two working groups, API participated in discussions about the government reports on corruption in Cambodia. Some of these reports concerned the implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) or are related to the so-called Universal Periodic Review (UPR). Despite the fact that here the Government has been trying to limit our inputs, together with other CSOs and UN stakeholders we managed to produce a shadow report on some of the chapters and submitted it to the UN Human Rights Office in Geneva, in late 2018. Finally, the Anti-Corruption law was passed and also partially enforced, at least at the local level, leading, among other things, to more transparent public services fees and procedures.
  • economic policies: A number of problematic land concessions were cancelled or their terms were reduced, following the joint advocacy efforts of API and other civil society organizations active in the field of natural resources management and fisheries. Here, FACT and our colleagues from the NGO Forum were among our main partners.

Recent Challenges

Against the background of the recent developments in Cambodia’s political landscape, API had to rethink its projects and activities. At the level of the grassroots communities, the activities of community based organisations and NGOs have been either monitored or put under scrutiny over the past few years. This pressure has been further exacerbated by government efforts to reinforce the new NGO Law that is widely seen as a threat to the freedom of assembly of our civil society.

This political climate appears to have some consequences on the work of API with other CSOs. For example, activity related information has to be provided to government before community meetings or people forums can be organised. API has had to lower its tone on advocacy, engaging in a constructive dialogue and strengthening mutual relationships of trust rather than confronting.

img-2

Our New Approach

API considers capacity building as a means to develop and reinforce the feeling of local ownership: The more grassroots organisations are able to achieve using their own skills, the higher their stakes will be in preserving, consolidating and further extending their achievements. For this reason, together with its many partners, API will keep coaching and mentoring CBOs and CSOs, offering workshops on advocacy and facilitation skills, and, wherever possible, raising the awareness of local citizens through community fora and dialogues. Responding to various gaps in laws and policies, and especially in their enforcement, API will therefore continue:

  • monitoring and trying to influence policies and their implementation in areas such as road traffic, public education, decentralisation and de-concentration, and of course access to public information (A2I);
  • strengthening the capacity of CSOs and their networks in the fields of advocacy, policy analysis and monitoring;
  • developing and using innovative learning and sharing platforms meant to influence decision making and address critical policy issues.